And Then I Read: RED MARS by Kim Stanley Robinson

redmars

© Kim Stanley Robinson.

When this novel, the first of a trilogy, was published in 1993, I read good things about it in LOCUS, and elsewhere. I always meant to read it, just took me a few years. Well, okay, more than a few. In fact, it took my friend Tim giving me his copy!

Before starting this review I did a little Wikipedia research on the author. After reading the book, I expected to learn that his primary career is science, with a sideline in writing. Not so, the man graduated with several degrees in Literature. How, then was he able to write so convincingly about the very hard science in this work, the science of rocketry, geology (areology in this case), engineering, physics, even soft sciences like psychology, and all of it completely convincingly told from an insider’s point of view? Apparently he did lots and lots of research. Still, what an impressive achievement this is merely in that one area! Except in a few cases where he pushes the boundaries of science as we know it, this book reads more like a true account of the colonization of Mars than a work of science fiction, as if Mr. Robinson has a window into humanity’s future.

The structure of the book divides it into eight parts of differing lengths, each with a different narrator. All the narrators are from the 100 original settlers sent from Earth to begin the colonization and eventual terraforming of Mars. To keep things from being too predictable, though, he starts in the middle with a shocking murder story, then goes back to the beginning: the voyage of the 100 from Earth, and lets the story progress from there until we realize all the more what a tragedy that first chapter was. And through to the end of this book, a rise and fall of epic proportions as Mars is colonized, developed, overtaken by corporate politics, rocked by sabotage that erupts into a full-scale revolution, and…but I’ll let you find out if you’d like to read it.

The characters are wonderfully real. Mainly scientist and astronaut types, but a variety of personalities, each a complex collection of flaws, features and obsessions. Mars itself is a major character, despite being lifeless until the Earthlings arrive. They soon change that. And a great deal of the planet is explored by the characters as the story unfolds.

I’ll be reading the rest of the Mars trilogy soon, and probably other books by Kim Stanley Robinson, too. In a way I can’t believe it took me so long to try him, I think I may put him up there with John Varley as a favorite hard SF writer of the “second generation,” with the first generation being Heinlein, Asimov and Clarke. He’s that good. Very highly recommended!

4 thoughts on “And Then I Read: RED MARS by Kim Stanley Robinson

  1. Kathy H

    I’ve been picking up many of your reading suggestions, and you haven’t steered my wrong yet. Thanks, Todd! PS: I’ve just re-read the full run of Sandman comics and am once again impressed by your lettering! The lettering is, believe it or not, one of the first things I notice. Yours tells us more about the characters and supports the story. I’m so happy I found your blog!

  2. John

    Have you heard AMC is turning it into a tv series?

    Green Mars is also good. I hated Blue Mars. Years of Rice and Salt, Antarctica are good too. But my favorites are The Gold Coast and The Wild Shore.

  3. Fnord Serious

    I quite enjoyed Robinson’s Mars trilogy as well. I find a lot of hard sf sacrifices characterization in favor of the science. Gladly, this was not the case for these books. My only complaint about the series would be that he tells some of the same scenes again from a different perspective, and he doesn’t quite have the chops to make it not feel repetitive.
    Another hard sf writer I enjoy that you didn’t mention is Vernor Vinge. He is almost the Morrison of hard sf, throwing concepts at you fast & furious, letting your mind tackle them as it will and only stopping to be=reak down the particulars of those most germane to the story. He is also good at handling characterization, which as I mentioned is one of my bugaboos about a lot of hard sf.

  4. Todd Post author

    Thanks, Kathy! I had heard that, John, but don’t expect much to come of it that I’d like. Call me skeptical. Agree with you, Fnord, I’ve put down some hard SF because it was all exposition, no character development. I did try one Vinge book and didn’t take to it, perhaps I’ll try him again another time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.